Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 89130 for w a v.
Search results 16951 - 16960 of 89130 for w a v.
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
Aug 27, 2025 2024AP000775 State v. C. W. 1 Milwaukee PDF Aug 27, 2025 2024AP000574-CRNM State v
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=08/27/2025&end_date=08/27/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD
Aug 27, 2025 2024AP000775 State v. C. W. 1 Milwaukee PDF Aug 27, 2025 2024AP000574-CRNM State v
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=08/27/2025&end_date=08/27/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD
State v. Benjamin M.R.
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BENJAMIN M.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10062 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BENJAMIN M.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10062 - 2005-03-31
Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOWARD, NEEDLES, TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF, ROBERT A. TEPER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8135 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOWARD, NEEDLES, TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF, ROBERT A. TEPER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8135 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph P.
, v. JOSEPH P., Respondent-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9675 - 2005-03-31
, v. JOSEPH P., Respondent-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9675 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph P.
, v. JOSEPH P., Respondent-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
, v. JOSEPH P., Respondent-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald W. Arendt, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104361 - 2013-11-19
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald W. Arendt, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104361 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. ANTHONY W. SMITH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042603 - 2025-11-25
, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. ANTHONY W. SMITH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042603 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was sufficient is a question of a law we review independently. Tammy W-G. v. Jacob T., 2011 WI 30, ¶17, 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677696 - 2023-07-11
was sufficient is a question of a law we review independently. Tammy W-G. v. Jacob T., 2011 WI 30, ¶17, 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677696 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. DONALD W. ARENDT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. DONALD W. ARENDT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 126
-RESPONDENT, V. RONALD W. LICHTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.† Opinion Filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88590 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENT, V. RONALD W. LICHTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.† Opinion Filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88590 - 2014-09-15

