Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16961 - 16970 of 57545 for a i x.
Search results 16961 - 16970 of 57545 for a i x.
Shirley Krug v. Cathy S. Zeuske
) DYKMAN, J. (dissenting). I agree with the majority's interpretation of article IV, § 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8336 - 2005-03-31
) DYKMAN, J. (dissenting). I agree with the majority's interpretation of article IV, § 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. amend. IV. In the Wisconsin Constitution, article I, section 11 is substantively identical. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808733 - 2024-06-05
. amend. IV. In the Wisconsin Constitution, article I, section 11 is substantively identical. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808733 - 2024-06-05
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5558 - 2017-09-19
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5553 - 2017-09-19
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5553 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5565 - 2017-09-19
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5565 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5563 - 2017-09-19
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5563 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5560 - 2017-09-19
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5560 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “[W]ho do I have to bring in here?” After the court questioned Jane’s attorney about Jane’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
, “[W]ho do I have to bring in here?” After the court questioned Jane’s attorney about Jane’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5559 - 2017-09-19
to him “[t]hat isn’t what I expect.” ¶10 The trial court concluded that its plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5559 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2008AP395-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF4879 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35500 - 2009-02-09
. Appeal No. 2008AP395-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF4879 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35500 - 2009-02-09