Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16961 - 16970 of 29860 for des.
Search results 16961 - 16970 of 29860 for des.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24945 - 2006-04-27
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24945 - 2006-04-27
State v. Todd R. Gilbertson
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10480 - 2005-03-31
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10480 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of our review is limited and is the same as the circuit court’s. De Pue v. Mastermold, Inc., 161 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658356 - 2023-05-18
of our review is limited and is the same as the circuit court’s. De Pue v. Mastermold, Inc., 161 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658356 - 2023-05-18
[PDF]
State v. Karl D. Heppner
the weight to be accorded his [or her] testimony is for the [fact-finder].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
the weight to be accorded his [or her] testimony is for the [fact-finder].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald Harris
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jared J.
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12836 - 2017-09-21
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Brown
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
beginning his argument by telling us that we are reviewing a question of law, using the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137952 - 2015-03-18
beginning his argument by telling us that we are reviewing a question of law, using the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137952 - 2015-03-18