Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 30097 for de.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 30097 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. ¶8 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100241 - 2013-07-31
hearing. ¶8 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100241 - 2013-07-31
[PDF]
Donald Murtaugh v. State
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6124 - 2017-09-19
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6124 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 598. We review de novo whether the officers’ exercise of their community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 598. We review de novo whether the officers’ exercise of their community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 6
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265, ¶13, 240 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131811 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265, ¶13, 240 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131811 - 2017-09-21
Paula M.S. v. Neal A.R.
, § 805.17(2), Stats., we review de novo the circuit court’s legal conclusion that statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13923 - 2005-03-31
, § 805.17(2), Stats., we review de novo the circuit court’s legal conclusion that statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13923 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d 648, ¶27. ¶12 The “[f]ailure to call a potential witness may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170189 - 2017-09-21
is reviewed de novo. Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d 648, ¶27. ¶12 The “[f]ailure to call a potential witness may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Dilworth
purposes is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo based on the facts as found by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
purposes is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo based on the facts as found by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Karen C.
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Evelyn Hommrich v. Brown County Mental Health Center
. The De Pere Branch remained open. ¶3 In January 1994, a “plan of correction” was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15397 - 2017-09-21
. The De Pere Branch remained open. ¶3 In January 1994, a “plan of correction” was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lonny Mayer
is sufficient to permit the instruction, our review is de novo, State v. Wilson, 149 Wis. 2d 878, 898, 440
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6870 - 2017-09-20
is sufficient to permit the instruction, our review is de novo, State v. Wilson, 149 Wis. 2d 878, 898, 440
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6870 - 2017-09-20