Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 29721 for des.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 29721 for des.
Frontsheet
, are subject to de novo review. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Davison, 2010 WI 1, ¶19, 322 Wis. 2d 67
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53724 - 2010-08-23
, are subject to de novo review. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Davison, 2010 WI 1, ¶19, 322 Wis. 2d 67
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53724 - 2010-08-23
[PDF]
Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14445 - 2017-09-21
review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14445 - 2017-09-21
David J. Barkow v. Matthew J. Ciesielczyk
give the terms of a statute their ordinary meaning. Id. "These are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9481 - 2005-03-31
give the terms of a statute their ordinary meaning. Id. "These are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
interpretation. We review such questions de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28263 - 2007-03-05
interpretation. We review such questions de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28263 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365934 - 2021-05-11
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365934 - 2021-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
a Machner hearing. See id. We review this question de novo. Id. ¶16 Bosman contends his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32752 - 2008-05-19
a Machner hearing. See id. We review this question de novo. Id. ¶16 Bosman contends his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32752 - 2008-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principals presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
to constitutional principals presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12