Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leo Barron Hicks
provided the client would receive monthly billing statements. ¶6 The case was settled in July of 1998
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16662 - 2005-03-31
provided the client would receive monthly billing statements. ¶6 The case was settled in July of 1998
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16662 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles L. Davies
injury or sexual assault. He further cites to a victim impact statement completed prior to sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16334 - 2005-03-31
injury or sexual assault. He further cites to a victim impact statement completed prior to sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the statements that Johnny said he could not hear were then repeated. For example, during assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75598 - 2014-09-15
and the statements that Johnny said he could not hear were then repeated. For example, during assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75598 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michelle S.
) in not suppressing statements made by Michelle S. to a social worker when the social worker did not first warn her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19
) in not suppressing statements made by Michelle S. to a social worker when the social worker did not first warn her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Jagodinsky
the trial court expressly found that he did not, we are puzzled by this statement. First, the court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
the trial court expressly found that he did not, we are puzzled by this statement. First, the court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
probability of a different result because Wallace’s statement was “based on rank hearsay and lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
probability of a different result because Wallace’s statement was “based on rank hearsay and lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-15
Outagamie County v. Martin J. McGlone
.” Third, McGlone asserts that false and misleading statements provide the foundation for the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15556 - 2005-03-31
.” Third, McGlone asserts that false and misleading statements provide the foundation for the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15556 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Confucius Gooden
the victim's statement recommending ten years' incarceration. Whether a prosecutor violated the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
the victim's statement recommending ten years' incarceration. Whether a prosecutor violated the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
. Armstrong first argues that the statement he gave to police should have been suppressed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31