Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 50107 for our.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 767.61(2)(a) (2023-24)3] is to be divided equally between the parties.” Section 767.61(3). ¶10 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973824 - 2025-06-25
. § 767.61(2)(a) (2023-24)3] is to be divided equally between the parties.” Section 767.61(3). ¶10 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973824 - 2025-06-25
CA Blank Order
procedures in accepting Meindel’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2015-06-16
procedures in accepting Meindel’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
15, ¶42, 307 Wis. 2d 555, 745 N.W.2d 397. Stated one way, our inquiry is whether “the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123250 - 2017-09-21
15, ¶42, 307 Wis. 2d 555, 745 N.W.2d 397. Stated one way, our inquiry is whether “the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James C. Eaton v. Anne Paula Eaton
for her attorney's fees. Ms. Eaton objects to both determinations and appeals. II. DISCUSSION Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8752 - 2017-09-19
for her attorney's fees. Ms. Eaton objects to both determinations and appeals. II. DISCUSSION Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8752 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the primary objectives of Radford’s sentence.” (Emphasis in original.) Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766224 - 2024-02-20
with the primary objectives of Radford’s sentence.” (Emphasis in original.) Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766224 - 2024-02-20
[PDF]
Malcolm H. v. Marc J. Ackerman
attorney appear pro hac vice on this case. Based on our disposition of the case, however, this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11441 - 2017-09-19
attorney appear pro hac vice on this case. Based on our disposition of the case, however, this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11441 - 2017-09-19
WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1910-CR Complete Title...
precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule. Id. at 2423-24. ¶7 Our supreme court adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110749 - 2014-05-27
precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule. Id. at 2423-24. ¶7 Our supreme court adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110749 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Id., ¶3. Upon our independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165558 - 2017-09-21
and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Id., ¶3. Upon our independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165558 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenges the constitutionality of that statute, as applied to him. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160780 - 2017-09-21
challenges the constitutionality of that statute, as applied to him. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101616 - 2017-09-21
arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101616 - 2017-09-21