Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 58340 for speedy trial.

City of Fort Atkinson v. Ronald A. Lendabarker
a stipulated trial, Lendabarker was convicted of both counts by the City of Fort Atkinson Municipal Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10501 - 2005-03-31

Vivian Jensen v. John A. Jrolf
Investments (hereafter "Jrolf"), appeals from a trial court judgment barring him from claiming any right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10394 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
for the timely payment of rent and Durand Shell breached this provision. After a bench trial, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34978 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Paul R. Brzycki
(1)(a), 941.30(1) and 939.63 (2001-02). 1 Brzycki contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7198 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
. He argues that his postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31269 - 2014-09-15

Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
and Ralph Steinberg appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict. The Steinbergs claim that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14786 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Anthony L. Gipson
to a police officer in a post-polygraph interview. The trial court ruled that the statements given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3148 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
was involuntary because his trial counsel misinformed him regarding the DNA requirements of Wis. Stat. ยง 973.047
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28565 - 2007-03-26

[PDF] State v. Daniel W. Corrigan
was denied his constitutional right to confront a witness when the trial court admitted the then-deceased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19

State v. Justin H.
for secured placement. Because the trial court could reasonably conclude from the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9425 - 2005-03-31