Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 73361 for we.
Search results 16971 - 16980 of 73361 for we.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond. Hortman has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623592 - 2023-02-21
to respond. Hortman has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623592 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
Richard P. Cline v. Kristine H. Zynda
his motion was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Because we conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14397 - 2014-09-15
his motion was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Because we conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14397 - 2014-09-15
State v. James A. Carroll
. § 947.01 (1999-2000),[2] dated September 27, 1999. He raises several issues regarding his conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2512 - 2005-03-31
. § 947.01 (1999-2000),[2] dated September 27, 1999. He raises several issues regarding his conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2512 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that follow, we affirm the circuit court. ¶2 The majority of the facts are undisputed. In February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
that follow, we affirm the circuit court. ¶2 The majority of the facts are undisputed. In February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259606 - 2020-05-06
as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259606 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court erred by denying his suppression motions, but we conclude the dispositive issue is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
that the court erred by denying his suppression motions, but we conclude the dispositive issue is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Marian R. Crosswhite v. Deborah L. Zivko
testimony rebutted the presumption that the transfer was made with donative intent, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9495 - 2017-09-19
testimony rebutted the presumption that the transfer was made with donative intent, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9495 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
did not resolve the prejudice, and that he should get a new trial. We hold that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48541 - 2010-03-30
did not resolve the prejudice, and that he should get a new trial. We hold that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48541 - 2010-03-30
State v. Bart E. Jenson
sentencing discretion, and whether the prosecutor’s improper closing arguments warrant a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6382 - 2005-03-31
sentencing discretion, and whether the prosecutor’s improper closing arguments warrant a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6382 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
within the meaning of Anders and RULE 809.32, we reject the no-merit report. After a five-day jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149129 - 2017-09-21
within the meaning of Anders and RULE 809.32, we reject the no-merit report. After a five-day jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149129 - 2017-09-21