Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16981 - 16990 of 50100 for our.

[PDF] State v. Roger F. Lewis
, 167 Wis.2d 1, 481 N.W.2d 476 (1992). Our reading of § 343.305(4), STATS., satisfies us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9990 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kimberly M. Desimone
property. In our view, this is a temporary relinquishment case, not an abandonment case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19730 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
” and was objectively biased. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305156 - 2020-11-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and its Board of Review, together with an award of frivolous costs. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185263 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles Patterson
goal of statutory construction is to ascertain the legislature’s intent, and our first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101616 - 2013-09-02

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
to the no-merit report to elaborate on any such claim. Our independent review of the record does not reveal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97084 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155851 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with respect to her injuries is not before us. We therefore limit our discussion in this opinion to Mark’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686862 - 2023-08-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and appellate counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559592 - 2022-08-30