Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16981 - 16990 of 50100 for our.
Search results 16981 - 16990 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133569 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments that might be resolved in his favor by new interpretations of the law by our supreme court, I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
arguments that might be resolved in his favor by new interpretations of the law by our supreme court, I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218257 - 2018-08-24
lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218257 - 2018-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Eureka Scruggs
to her weakened and impaired state. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
to her weakened and impaired state. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
County of Jefferson v. James A. Lenz
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 We note that effective April 6, 2018, our legislature changed one of the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295085 - 2020-10-13
3 We note that effective April 6, 2018, our legislature changed one of the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295085 - 2020-10-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
exists when our confidence in the outcome is undermined. Id. No. 2006AP1656-CR 3 ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
exists when our confidence in the outcome is undermined. Id. No. 2006AP1656-CR 3 ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
197. Sentencing decisions are afforded a presumption of reasonability consistent with our strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22
197. Sentencing decisions are afforded a presumption of reasonability consistent with our strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66183 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[does] not perform a Sullivan analysis ..., our review is de novo. State v. Lock, 2012 WI App 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110427 - 2017-09-21
[does] not perform a Sullivan analysis ..., our review is de novo. State v. Lock, 2012 WI App 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110427 - 2017-09-21