Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16991 - 17000 of 29712 for des.
Search results 16991 - 17000 of 29712 for des.
09AP5 State v. Jill Y. Treleven.doc
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Jill Y. Treleven contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
: linda m. van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Jill Y. Treleven contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37755 - 2014-09-15
to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Todd R. Gilbertson
a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10480 - 2017-09-20
a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10480 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258474 - 2020-04-28
, which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258474 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
State v. John T. Werner
of law we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3297 - 2017-09-19
of law we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3297 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Shannon S. v. Jackson C.
a question of statutory construction, an issue of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Williams, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7035 - 2017-09-20
a question of statutory construction, an issue of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Williams, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7035 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 6
review the application of those facts to constitutional principles de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75497 - 2014-09-15
review the application of those facts to constitutional principles de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75497 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Knight
was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 973, 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15116 - 2017-09-21
was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 973, 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15116 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. If the motion meets this standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
). This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. If the motion meets this standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of reasonable suspicion is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶19, 231 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402470 - 2021-07-30
of reasonable suspicion is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶19, 231 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402470 - 2021-07-30