Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 171 - 180 of 6293 for 208.

[PDF] Town of Burke v. City of Madison
interpretation which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14011 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Raheim Cason
confession is recantation testimony needing corroboration under State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 561 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3761 - 2017-09-19

Town of Burke v. City of Madison
de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13521 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is not merely cumulative.” Id., ¶32 (quoting State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237000 - 2019-03-12

State v. Raheim Cason
corroboration under State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997), and Cason has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3761 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Burke v. City of Madison
interpretation which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13521 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be corroborated by other newly discovered evidence. State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473-74, 561 N.W.2d 707
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15

Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. § 102.23(6); United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Lust, 208 Wis. 2d 306, 321, 560 N.W.2d 301, 306–307 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3337 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
); United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Lust, 208 Wis. 2d 306, 321, 560 N.W.2d 301, 306–307 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3337 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jose Soto
for determining a motion to withdraw a guilty plea prior to sentencing. In Libke v. State, 60 Wis.2d 121, 208 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31