Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 171 - 180 of 414 for nr.
Search results 171 - 180 of 414 for nr.
State v. Door County Board of Adjustment
; and (4) the variance did substantial justice. See § 59.694(7)(c), Stats.; Wis. Adm. Code § NR 115.05(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13279 - 2005-03-31
; and (4) the variance did substantial justice. See § 59.694(7)(c), Stats.; Wis. Adm. Code § NR 115.05(6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Door County Board of Adjustment
. ADM. CODE § NR 115.05(6)(e) (1995); see also DOOR COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE § 11.06(3) (1995). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13279 - 2017-09-21
. ADM. CODE § NR 115.05(6)(e) (1995); see also DOOR COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE § 11.06(3) (1995). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13279 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. NR 103 and Wis. Admin. Code § NR 299.04. Bye requested a contested case hearing, which was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134831 - 2015-02-09
. NR 103 and Wis. Admin. Code § NR 299.04. Bye requested a contested case hearing, which was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134831 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and in 2017, the Department initiated a master planning procedure under WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. NR 44 (through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286762 - 2020-09-15
, and in 2017, the Department initiated a master planning procedure under WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. NR 44 (through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286762 - 2020-09-15
Robert J. Nehm v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
. As a result of that investigation, a NOD was issued pursuant to Wis. Adm. Code ch. NR 243. At that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10939 - 2005-03-31
. As a result of that investigation, a NOD was issued pursuant to Wis. Adm. Code ch. NR 243. At that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. NR 103 and WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR 299.04. Bye requested a contested case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134831 - 2017-09-21
of WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. NR 103 and WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR 299.04. Bye requested a contested case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert J. Nehm v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
of that investigation, a NOD was issued pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE ch. NR 243. At that time, the Nehms were also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10939 - 2017-09-20
of that investigation, a NOD was issued pursuant to WIS. ADM. CODE ch. NR 243. At that time, the Nehms were also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10939 - 2017-09-20
2008 WI APP 133
would not permit APCA’s private facility. See Wis. Admin. Code § NR 326.04(8) (May 2008). [5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33293 - 2011-06-14
would not permit APCA’s private facility. See Wis. Admin. Code § NR 326.04(8) (May 2008). [5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33293 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI APP 133
of Natural Resources regulation, which would not permit APCA’s private facility. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33293 - 2014-09-15
of Natural Resources regulation, which would not permit APCA’s private facility. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33293 - 2014-09-15
Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
argue that Wis. Admin. Code § NR 325.065 was valid and in effect during most of the decade in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15875 - 2005-03-31
argue that Wis. Admin. Code § NR 325.065 was valid and in effect during most of the decade in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15875 - 2005-03-31