Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 171 - 180 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 171 - 180 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Vernon H. Walker
in issuing a related search warrant; (2) adjourning Walker’s speedy trial; (3) condoning prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
in issuing a related search warrant; (2) adjourning Walker’s speedy trial; (3) condoning prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
State v. Corey R. Saxby
argues that his constitutional speedy trial right was violated, that the trial court erroneously refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5967 - 2005-03-31
argues that his constitutional speedy trial right was violated, that the trial court erroneously refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Williams argues that his right to a speedy trial was violated, his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677698 - 2023-07-11
postconviction motion. Williams argues that his right to a speedy trial was violated, his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677698 - 2023-07-11
State v. Thomas H. Highman
for postconviction relief.[2] He contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3735 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[2] He contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3735 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas H. Highman
to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore is entitled to a reversal of the judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3735 - 2017-09-19
to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore is entitled to a reversal of the judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3735 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas H. Highman
for postconviction relief.[2] He contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3736 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[2] He contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas H. Highman
to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore is entitled to a reversal of the judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3736 - 2017-09-19
to a speedy trial was violated, and he therefore is entitled to a reversal of the judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3736 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Pharoah Vernon Morris
a conviction for armed robbery. He contends that he did not receive a speedy trial, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2222 - 2017-09-19
a conviction for armed robbery. He contends that he did not receive a speedy trial, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2222 - 2017-09-19
State v. Toni P. Cayton
when a speedy trial violation would have been obvious. The trial court correctly decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3867 - 2005-03-31
when a speedy trial violation would have been obvious. The trial court correctly decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3867 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Toni P. Cayton
was ineffective for filing a no merit Anders brief when a speedy trial violation would have been obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3867 - 2017-09-20
was ineffective for filing a no merit Anders brief when a speedy trial violation would have been obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3867 - 2017-09-20