Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 17421 for Cost.
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
. Morters appeals pro se from the order granting the defendants’ motion for costs and attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
. Morters appeals pro se from the order granting the defendants’ motion for costs and attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) that no costs be assessed against Attorney Smead. ¶2 Attorney Smead
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75496 - 2011-12-19
of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) that no costs be assessed against Attorney Smead. ¶2 Attorney Smead
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75496 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Robert B. Fennig
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding. 1 SCR 20:8.4 provides, in pertinent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17345 - 2017-09-21
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding. 1 SCR 20:8.4 provides, in pertinent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17345 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent circuit court order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12399 - 2017-09-21
and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent circuit court order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12399 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent circuit court order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12073 - 2017-09-21
and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent circuit court order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12073 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James Paul O'Neil
the client's consent, and that he be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16618 - 2005-03-31
the client's consent, and that he be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16618 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
the determination that the action was frivolous and reverse that part of the judgment awarding Klinzing costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
the determination that the action was frivolous and reverse that part of the judgment awarding Klinzing costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ordered that a judgment be issued for Nelson’s costs, including attorney’s fees, relating to Nelson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68666 - 2014-09-15
ordered that a judgment be issued for Nelson’s costs, including attorney’s fees, relating to Nelson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68666 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn E. Morrissey
recommended that Attorney Morrissey be ordered to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20715 - 2005-12-19
recommended that Attorney Morrissey be ordered to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20715 - 2005-12-19
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
awarding Jack Smith costs and attorney fees based on the Lucarelis’ frivolous action against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
awarding Jack Smith costs and attorney fees based on the Lucarelis’ frivolous action against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31