Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 15404 for probate.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 15404 for probate.
COURT OF APPEALS
Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.[2] ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31095 - 2007-12-10
Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.[2] ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31095 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the 1997 plea hearing: (1) Steinhorst inaccurately believed that the court could give him a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74287 - 2014-09-15
of the 1997 plea hearing: (1) Steinhorst inaccurately believed that the court could give him a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74287 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
believed that the court could give him a probation disposition, which was not in fact a sentencing option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74287 - 2011-11-22
believed that the court could give him a probation disposition, which was not in fact a sentencing option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74287 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
WI APP 70
probation or initial confinement of less than three years only if the defendant is not more than forty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173251 - 2017-09-21
probation or initial confinement of less than three years only if the defendant is not more than forty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and placed Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.2 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31095 - 2014-09-15
and placed Burns on probation for three years, with six months of confinement as a condition.2 ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31095 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP1398-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF32
) and 328.16 (1981),6 that was a reasonable response to a “special need” of the probation system. The Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68708 - 2014-09-15
) and 328.16 (1981),6 that was a reasonable response to a “special need” of the probation system. The Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68708 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
affirming a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that denied two motions to reopen his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82617 - 2012-05-16
affirming a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that denied two motions to reopen his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82617 - 2012-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 On April 12, 2013, Velez-Figueroa was on probation in Milwaukee County Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 On April 12, 2013, Velez-Figueroa was on probation in Milwaukee County Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190344 - 2017-09-21
judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190344 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard A. Nuchell
to twenty days in jail as a condition of probation. We affirm. Nuchell was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14000 - 2005-03-31
to twenty days in jail as a condition of probation. We affirm. Nuchell was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14000 - 2005-03-31