Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
-0931-CR 2 motion for postconviction relief. 1 Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20
-0931-CR 2 motion for postconviction relief. 1 Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Patrick D. Zolliecoffer seeks a new trial after his convictions for disorderly conduct, battery to a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245267 - 2019-08-20
. Patrick D. Zolliecoffer seeks a new trial after his convictions for disorderly conduct, battery to a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245267 - 2019-08-20
State v. Ronnie L. Ringold
that the trial court erred in denying his request for an adjournment to obtain substitute counsel. Ringold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7295 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in denying his request for an adjournment to obtain substitute counsel. Ringold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7295 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial because the trial court erroneously “deferr[ed] to the sheriff’s request” to have the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346198 - 2021-03-17
trial because the trial court erroneously “deferr[ed] to the sheriff’s request” to have the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346198 - 2021-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
to a public trial was violated when the trial court posted a sign on the courtroom door that no one under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62520 - 2011-04-12
to a public trial was violated when the trial court posted a sign on the courtroom door that no one under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62520 - 2011-04-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
to a public trial was violated No. 2009AP2496-CR 2 when the trial court posted a sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62520 - 2014-09-15
to a public trial was violated No. 2009AP2496-CR 2 when the trial court posted a sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62520 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92144 - 2013-01-28
motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92144 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Joseph R. King
to vacate his pleas No. 2005AP1632-CR 2 and go to trial. He also argues that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25477 - 2017-09-21
to vacate his pleas No. 2005AP1632-CR 2 and go to trial. He also argues that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25477 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph R. King
to and after sentencing, presents numerous arguments related to his desire to vacate his pleas and go to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25477 - 2006-06-12
to and after sentencing, presents numerous arguments related to his desire to vacate his pleas and go to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25477 - 2006-06-12