Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 1701 - 1710 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Jose S. Soto, Sr.
denying his petition for a new trial and postconviction discovery motion. He argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7176 - 2005-03-31
denying his petition for a new trial and postconviction discovery motion. He argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7176 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief.[1] Gardner argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) due to the ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89960 - 2012-12-04
for postconviction relief.[1] Gardner argues that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) due to the ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89960 - 2012-12-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because: (1) due to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89960 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to a new trial because: (1) due to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jose S. Soto, Sr.
, all as party to a crime.1 He also appeals from an order denying his petition for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7176 - 2017-09-20
, all as party to a crime.1 He also appeals from an order denying his petition for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7176 - 2017-09-20
State v. Ervin J. Seidl
, second offense, contrary to ยง 343.44(1), Stats., entered after he pled guilty. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14654 - 2005-03-31
, second offense, contrary to ยง 343.44(1), Stats., entered after he pled guilty. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ervin J. Seidl
., entered after he pled guilty. He claims that the trial court violated his constitutional rights when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14654 - 2017-09-21
., entered after he pled guilty. He claims that the trial court violated his constitutional rights when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Family Disposition Summary
Categories Total Opened TotalReopened Total Disposed Jury Trials Court Trials Settlement Default
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/familydisposumcounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06
Categories Total Opened TotalReopened Total Disposed Jury Trials Court Trials Settlement Default
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/familydisposumcounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
Family Disposition - County Wide Report
Categories Total Opened TotalReopened Total Disposed Jury Trials Court Trials Settlement Default
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/familydisposumcounty22.pdf - 2023-02-13
Categories Total Opened TotalReopened Total Disposed Jury Trials Court Trials Settlement Default
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/familydisposumcounty22.pdf - 2023-02-13
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
-0931-CR 2 motion for postconviction relief. 1 Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20
-0931-CR 2 motion for postconviction relief. 1 Sanicki argues that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20