Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17001 - 17010 of 29827 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is an issue that this court reviews de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. S.L.L., 2019 WI 66, ¶10, 387 Wis. 2d 333, 929
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17

[PDF] Michael Ives v. Coopertools
of law that we review de novo. See Oakley v. Fireman's Fund, 162 Wis.2d 821, 826, 470 N.W.2d 882, 884
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8867 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kevin Brown
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21

Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 51
the pleadings comported with the constitutional notice requirements is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15

State v. Sally S. Boerner
case, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis.2d 155, 160, 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13575 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher L. Nagel
for Outagamie County: John a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. HOOVER, J. Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13302 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The application of the implied consent law to an undisputed set of facts is a question this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297757 - 2020-10-21

City of New Berlin v. Jeffery D. Eggum
, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14059 - 2005-03-31

State v. James E. Gray
. Construction of a statute involves a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31