Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17001 - 17010 of 50122 for our.
Search results 17001 - 17010 of 50122 for our.
CA Blank Order
it was not bound by the plea negotiations or the PSI recommendation. Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131671 - 2014-12-16
it was not bound by the plea negotiations or the PSI recommendation. Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131671 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
warrantless entry of his apartment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07
warrantless entry of his apartment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
that we exercise our authority under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55817 - 2010-10-26
that we exercise our authority under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55817 - 2010-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
will not abandon our neutrality to develop arguments. See Kruczek v. DWD, 2005 WI App 12, ¶32, 278 Wis. 2d 563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
will not abandon our neutrality to develop arguments. See Kruczek v. DWD, 2005 WI App 12, ¶32, 278 Wis. 2d 563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. This presents a question of statutory interpretation for our de novo review. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
. This presents a question of statutory interpretation for our de novo review. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 633, 635–636. Our review of summary-judgment determinations is also de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
N.W.2d 633, 635–636. Our review of summary-judgment determinations is also de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
Laurie Ruth Rosin v. Lee Alan Scholtus
463, 467 (1975). Our decision does not mandate a new evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11588 - 2005-03-31
463, 467 (1975). Our decision does not mandate a new evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11588 - 2005-03-31
Tina Gouty-Yellow v. Francis Yellow
. In light of our decision, we do not address the notice issue. BACKGROUND ¶2 Yellow and Gouty-Yellow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3463 - 2005-03-31
. In light of our decision, we do not address the notice issue. BACKGROUND ¶2 Yellow and Gouty-Yellow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3463 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
. Elizabeth argues that under § 802.05 our standard of review is deferential, whereas under § 814.025 our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
. Elizabeth argues that under § 802.05 our standard of review is deferential, whereas under § 814.025 our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Kelly S. Kincaid. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Kelly S. Kincaid. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22