Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17001 - 17010 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 17001 - 17010 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Eric Jason Smiley
to suppress his second statement; (3) trial counsel should have sought gunshot residue testing of the swabs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3586 - 2017-09-19
to suppress his second statement; (3) trial counsel should have sought gunshot residue testing of the swabs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3586 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
At the motion hearing, the trial court considered the two-part test that applies to a sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104027 - 2017-09-21
At the motion hearing, the trial court considered the two-part test that applies to a sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104027 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to perform field sobriety tests. However, before doing so, Schmitz asked Streckenbach the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460339 - 2021-12-07
to perform field sobriety tests. However, before doing so, Schmitz asked Streckenbach the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460339 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
State v. Walter Smith
had occurred. Both Smith and the State concede that Robertson's testimony was severely tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8406 - 2017-09-19
had occurred. Both Smith and the State concede that Robertson's testimony was severely tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8406 - 2017-09-19
Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
, the Board contends that it applied the “unnecessary hardship” test consistently with Kenosha County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12766 - 2005-03-31
, the Board contends that it applied the “unnecessary hardship” test consistently with Kenosha County Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12766 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
because the trial court judge was partial fails to satisfy Wisconsin’s judicial bias tests.6 In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45802 - 2014-09-15
because the trial court judge was partial fails to satisfy Wisconsin’s judicial bias tests.6 In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45802 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court judge was partial fails to satisfy Wisconsin’s judicial bias tests.[6] In State v. Neuaone, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
court judge was partial fails to satisfy Wisconsin’s judicial bias tests.[6] In State v. Neuaone, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeking to withdraw a post-sentencing plea on this basis must satisfy the two-prong test established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
seeking to withdraw a post-sentencing plea on this basis must satisfy the two-prong test established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress blood test results. He also challenges several of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98498 - 2014-09-15
to suppress blood test results. He also challenges several of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98498 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Reynosa’s arguments under each step of the Sullivan test. ¶8 As to the first step, Reynosa argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116712 - 2014-07-09
Reynosa’s arguments under each step of the Sullivan test. ¶8 As to the first step, Reynosa argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116712 - 2014-07-09