Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17001 - 17010 of 46240 for thefelix.top ⭕🏹 The Felix ⭕🏹 du an The Felix ⭕🏹 can ho The Felix ⭕🏹 chung cu The Felix.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred. We begin by recognizing that a defendant can challenge his or her sentence using
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237982 - 2019-03-21

[PDF] State v. Shane A. Mahler
can be obtained faster and easier than breath samples. He was unsure at the time whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16107 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph F. Michalkiewicz
material is that of which no more can be said than “it could have been subjected to tests, the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21090 - 2017-09-21

Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
can be by action or inaction that would make the intent explicit or implicit. Either action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tammy F.
The closest provision we can identify is § 804.09, STATS., which enables one party to the litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Eric L. King
, can I see your hat?” King handed the officer the baseball cap he was wearing, and the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26361 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David W. Stokes
proves to be unsuccessful have a new trial so a new strategy can be attempted, especially when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7897 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jesse S.
not the issue I’m determining now. What I’m going to do now, hopefully, is open the door so he can get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12382 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles G. Campbell
was Campbell, and that “in the videotape you can see it’s him.” No. 04-0213-CR 5 ¶9 Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7257 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that a personal colloquy with a defendant is required before waiver of the right can be affirmed. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93298 - 2014-09-15