Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17011 - 17020 of 30097 for de.
Search results 17011 - 17020 of 30097 for de.
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a defendant's statement was voluntary is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
consent statute to findings of fact is a legal question that we review de novo. See State v. Piddington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415846 - 2021-08-25
consent statute to findings of fact is a legal question that we review de novo. See State v. Piddington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415846 - 2021-08-25
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
review de novo. State v. 4 Based upon Wodenjak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. 4 Based upon Wodenjak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James W. Whistleman
of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3192 - 2017-09-19
of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3192 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35483 - 2009-02-10
The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35483 - 2009-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41416 - 2009-09-28
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41416 - 2009-09-28
Wayne K. Hermanson v. Horace Mann Insurance Company
the legal issue—whether Horace Mann had a duty to defend Reuter against Hermanson’s action—de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11414 - 2005-03-31
the legal issue—whether Horace Mann had a duty to defend Reuter against Hermanson’s action—de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11414 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ashanti D.
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15