Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17021 - 17030 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17021 - 17030 of 29823 for des.
Jeanne Finkenbinder v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12047 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles. See County of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415504 - 2021-08-25
review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles. See County of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415504 - 2021-08-25
State v. Taurius S. Fluker
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
State v. James S. Riedel
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of No. 2009AP25-CR 7 Marchant’s initial comment was de minimis. Moreover, whether a cell phone “will grab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74181 - 2014-09-15
of No. 2009AP25-CR 7 Marchant’s initial comment was de minimis. Moreover, whether a cell phone “will grab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74181 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the parties dispute whether this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46417 - 2014-09-15
the parties dispute whether this court applies a deferential or de novo review to the determination whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46417 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105, ¶32, 255 Wis. 2d 537, 648 N.W.2d 829. 6 ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175477 - 2017-09-21
is reviewed de novo. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105, ¶32, 255 Wis. 2d 537, 648 N.W.2d 829. 6 ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id.; Bartley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14549 - 2017-09-21
426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id.; Bartley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14549 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 6
review the application of those facts to constitutional principles de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75497 - 2014-09-15
review the application of those facts to constitutional principles de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75497 - 2014-09-15