Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17031 - 17040 of 29810 for des.
Search results 17031 - 17040 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 195 Wis. 2d at 496-97. Summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239432 - 2019-04-24
, 195 Wis. 2d at 496-97. Summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239432 - 2019-04-24
State v. Henry Pocan
… decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial ground based on competent evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18852 - 2005-07-05
… decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial ground based on competent evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18852 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then moved the circuit court for de novo review of the court commissioner’s decision, seeking to further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
then moved the circuit court for de novo review of the court commissioner’s decision, seeking to further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion on its face. See id. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104257 - 2013-11-18
the motion on its face. See id. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104257 - 2013-11-18
Jerome J. Hein v. Thomas N. Frieberg
facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ynocencio v. Fesko, 114 Wis. 2d 391, 396, 338 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ynocencio v. Fesko, 114 Wis. 2d 391, 396, 338 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31
Lorena M. Gribou v. Adam J. Hall
apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16216 - 2005-03-31
apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16216 - 2005-03-31
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.1 Judith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.1 Judith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently sought de novo review in the circuit court, requesting a jury trial. Both parties moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250938 - 2019-12-04
subsequently sought de novo review in the circuit court, requesting a jury trial. Both parties moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250938 - 2019-12-04
[PDF]
State v. Ashanti D.
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20