Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17041 - 17050 of 57912 for a i x.
Search results 17041 - 17050 of 57912 for a i x.
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Commission Respondents' Response to Respondents' Motion for Reconsideration of January 11, 2024 Order
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012624commresponse.pdf - 2024-01-26
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012624commresponse.pdf - 2024-01-26
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Wisconsin Elections Commission to April 2, 2024 Court Order
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0409wecresponse.pdf - 2024-04-09
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0409wecresponse.pdf - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
Court of Appeals
COURT OF APPEALS W I S C O N S I N C O U R T S Y S T E M WHAT THE COURT OF APPEALS IS AND HOW
/courts/resources/docs/appeals.pdf - 2026-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS W I S C O N S I N C O U R T S Y S T E M WHAT THE COURT OF APPEALS IS AND HOW
/courts/resources/docs/appeals.pdf - 2026-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
court following a bench trial. I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Zudac, which does business as Beltone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
court following a bench trial. I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Zudac, which does business as Beltone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Van Remmen
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12481 - 2017-09-21
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12481 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63154 - 2011-04-25
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63154 - 2011-04-25
Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
(concurring). I agree that the State's motion for reconsideration in this case should be denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17592 - 2005-03-31
(concurring). I agree that the State's motion for reconsideration in this case should be denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05
State v. Brian W. Shaw
,” and, therefore, “[i]f I cannot incarcerate him for a period of 18 months in the La Crosse County Jail, then I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
,” and, therefore, “[i]f I cannot incarcerate him for a period of 18 months in the La Crosse County Jail, then I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Subsequently, Bechard requested an enlargement of time, stating nonspecifically: “I have only a couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118673 - 2014-09-15
. Subsequently, Bechard requested an enlargement of time, stating nonspecifically: “I have only a couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118673 - 2014-09-15