Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17051 - 17060 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 17051 - 17060 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
discretion when it denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26775 - 2006-10-16
discretion when it denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26775 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94020 - 2014-09-15
reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94020 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted of delivery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
reject his claims and affirm the circuit court’s order. ¶2 Smith was convicted of delivery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Roderick M.
responsibility. The guardian claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14771 - 2017-09-21
responsibility. The guardian claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14771 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court denied McCormack’s claim for habeas corpus relief on the dual grounds that—to the extent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102288 - 2017-09-21
court denied McCormack’s claim for habeas corpus relief on the dual grounds that—to the extent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that we should exercise our discretion to address his claim. We decline and conclude the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
contends that we should exercise our discretion to address his claim. We decline and conclude the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclusion that the issues lacked arguable merit. We also addressed and rejected the claims Edmonson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
conclusion that the issues lacked arguable merit. We also addressed and rejected the claims Edmonson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94020 - 2013-03-12
a sufficient reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94020 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and analysis of the merits of Brown’s various claims. Appellate counsel explains that Brown’s multiplicity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327506 - 2021-01-26
and analysis of the merits of Brown’s various claims. Appellate counsel explains that Brown’s multiplicity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327506 - 2021-01-26