Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17061 - 17070 of 30107 for de.
Search results 17061 - 17070 of 30107 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Donald Harris
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jared J.
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12836 - 2017-09-21
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Brown
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
beginning his argument by telling us that we are reviewing a question of law, using the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137952 - 2015-03-18
beginning his argument by telling us that we are reviewing a question of law, using the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137952 - 2015-03-18
[PDF]
WI APP 115
. 2d 320, 786 N.W.2d 810. Whether a court properly awarded summary judgment is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86701 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 320, 786 N.W.2d 810. Whether a court properly awarded summary judgment is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86701 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Peter L. Steinberg v. Mark G. Sukowaty
and thus showed no evidence to allow tacking. We review summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11788 - 2017-09-20
and thus showed no evidence to allow tacking. We review summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11788 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6213 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6213 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 99
a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50541 - 2014-09-15
a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50541 - 2014-09-15