Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17061 - 17070 of 69109 for he.
Search results 17061 - 17070 of 69109 for he.
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
, testified to the events leading to Valstad’s arrest. Teachout testified that he was dispatched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
, testified to the events leading to Valstad’s arrest. Teachout testified that he was dispatched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael J. Landwehr v. Bernadette N. Landwehr
, and every other weekend. He also agreed to pay child support of $1,800 per month or 25% of his gross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6912 - 2017-09-20
, and every other weekend. He also agreed to pay child support of $1,800 per month or 25% of his gross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6912 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
of alcohol coming from Rooni at a distance of two to three feet. Heisel also noted that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
of alcohol coming from Rooni at a distance of two to three feet. Heisel also noted that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for possible mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35792 - 2009-03-09
for possible mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35792 - 2009-03-09
State v. Leonard V. Lauth
while intoxicated (OMVWI). He claims that the arresting officer detained him without constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11802 - 2005-03-31
while intoxicated (OMVWI). He claims that the arresting officer detained him without constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11802 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) (per curiam), arguing that he should be allowed to withdraw three no-contest pleas that he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
) (per curiam), arguing that he should be allowed to withdraw three no-contest pleas that he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with narcotics use. Prior to that time, Blanke had a conversation with Pasket, who advised that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44583 - 2009-12-14
with narcotics use. Prior to that time, Blanke had a conversation with Pasket, who advised that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44583 - 2009-12-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
)(a) (2011-12).[1] He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Lovejoy’s postconviction/appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
)(a) (2011-12).[1] He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Lovejoy’s postconviction/appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. David argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously admitted evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
. David argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously admitted evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11