Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17071 - 17080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17071 - 17080 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the parties’ agreement, matters which we review de novo.” Schwab v. Schwab, 2021 WI 67, ¶7, 397 Wis. 2d 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783379 - 2024-04-03
and the parties’ agreement, matters which we review de novo.” Schwab v. Schwab, 2021 WI 67, ¶7, 397 Wis. 2d 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783379 - 2024-04-03
City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶6 The temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L. Ambort
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co., 182 Wis.2d 97, 105, 513 N.W.2d 592, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14066 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co., 182 Wis.2d 97, 105, 513 N.W.2d 592, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14066 - 2005-03-31
Lorena M. Gribou v. Adam J. Hall
apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16216 - 2005-03-31
apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16216 - 2005-03-31
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14555 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis.2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18
present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18
Cathy Strozinsky v. School District of Brown Deer
. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13641 - 2005-03-31
. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Committee
, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16146 - 2017-09-21
, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16146 - 2017-09-21