Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17071 - 17080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17071 - 17080 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is an issue that this court reviews de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. S.L.L., 2019 WI 66, ¶10, 387 Wis. 2d 333, 929
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
is an issue that this court reviews de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. S.L.L., 2019 WI 66, ¶10, 387 Wis. 2d 333, 929
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Brown
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a motion to suppress, we review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174954 - 2017-09-21
of a motion to suppress, we review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Williams appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71554 - 2014-09-15
, and Williams appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71554 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James C. Berlin
of law subject to de novo review. Id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833. This motion was not governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9373 - 2017-09-19
of law subject to de novo review. Id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833. This motion was not governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9373 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jared J.
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12836 - 2017-09-21
are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526, 529, 457 N.W.2d 498, 499 (Ct. App. 1990), aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP1336 4 DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97393 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP1336 4 DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
exists is a question of law, which we review de novo. The existence of a new factor does not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53891 - 2014-09-15
exists is a question of law, which we review de novo. The existence of a new factor does not, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo whether counsel was deficient and whether any deficiency was prejudicial. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239893 - 2019-04-25
review de novo whether counsel was deficient and whether any deficiency was prejudicial. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239893 - 2019-04-25