Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17071 - 17080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17071 - 17080 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10928 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10928 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis.2d 222, 229, 499 N.W.2d 218, 221 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13583 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis.2d 222, 229, 499 N.W.2d 218, 221 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13583 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50218 - 2010-05-19
: robert de chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50218 - 2010-05-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237908 - 2019-03-22
conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237908 - 2019-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See State v. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶8, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634. However, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70214 - 2014-09-15
. See State v. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶8, 301 Wis. 2d 1, 733 N.W.2d 634. However, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70214 - 2014-09-15
WI App 36 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP3007-CR Complete Tit...
a search was reasonable, and therefore lawful under the Fourth Amendment, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92854 - 2013-03-26
a search was reasonable, and therefore lawful under the Fourth Amendment, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92854 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29624 - 2014-09-15
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29624 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Paula M.S. v. Neal A.R.
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, § 805.17(2), STATS., we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13923 - 2014-09-15
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, § 805.17(2), STATS., we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13923 - 2014-09-15
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
State v. Samuel Jones
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. at ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. at ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31