Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17071 - 17080 of 81676 for simple case.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
than this case. Larson dealt with an ambiguous statute whereas the issue of whether to charge under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28533 - 2007-03-26

COURT OF APPEALS
while intoxicated. ¶3 Renz is the law regarding the use of PBTs. In that case, the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35791 - 2009-03-10

State v. Heather M. M.
prosecution agreement under s. 938.24 (5). In such case statements made to the intake worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4002 - 2005-03-31

State v. Delbert L. Manke
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9399 - 2005-03-31

State v. Marvin D. Clements
the defendant’s intention matter in this case?—provides the background for the issue on appeal. When the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3168 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
otherwise noted. No. 2023AP1295-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880024 - 2024-11-26

State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating the court’s oral pronouncement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18320 - 2005-05-24

Margaret Hovey v. Allstate Insurance Company
, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had been called and dismissed. Her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15197 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel D. Brown
in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting impartially in the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14

Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
). The issue in this case is whether the Board acted according to law and whether the assessment was made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8586 - 2005-03-31