Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17081 - 17090 of 29712 for des.
Search results 17081 - 17090 of 29712 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29860 - 2007-07-31
court’s findings of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29860 - 2007-07-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Karleen K. Raasch
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to relief. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35125 - 2014-09-15
to relief. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35125 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3, (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3, (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶12, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35777 - 2014-09-15
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶12, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35777 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 99
a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50541 - 2014-09-15
a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50541 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10