Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17081 - 17090 of 50086 for our.
Search results 17081 - 17090 of 50086 for our.
CA Blank Order
our review of an agency decision is so highly deferential, we affirm. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
our review of an agency decision is so highly deferential, we affirm. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24
County of Jefferson v. James A. Lenz
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
brief recognized that the argument was abrogated by our decision in State v. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
Graddie Jude v. Allied Insurance Center, Inc.
304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12987 - 2010-12-28
304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12987 - 2010-12-28
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
Harman has not appealed from the referee's report or that recommendation. Accordingly, our review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23
Harman has not appealed from the referee's report or that recommendation. Accordingly, our review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18712 - 2005-06-23
Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
Wis.2d 222, 225, 496 N.W.2d 177, 179 (Ct. App. 1992). In construing a statute, our purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8266 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 222, 225, 496 N.W.2d 177, 179 (Ct. App. 1992). In construing a statute, our purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8266 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 358, ¶24. A reasonable probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125159 - 2014-10-22
Wis. 2d 358, ¶24. A reasonable probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125159 - 2014-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
interests is a matter within the trial court’s discretion and we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
interests is a matter within the trial court’s discretion and we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
City of Madison v. Timothy J. Duffy
officer to stop a person when he has less than probable cause. ¶11 Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
officer to stop a person when he has less than probable cause. ¶11 Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher T. Seiler
. In Quarles v. State, 70 Wis.2d 87, 90, 233 N.W.2d 401, 402 (1975), our supreme court discussed supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9561 - 2005-03-31
. In Quarles v. State, 70 Wis.2d 87, 90, 233 N.W.2d 401, 402 (1975), our supreme court discussed supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9561 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that we exercise our authority under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55817 - 2010-10-26
that we exercise our authority under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55817 - 2010-10-26