Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17091 - 17100 of 65927 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 17091 - 17100 of 65927 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
had decided to accept a plea offer from the State. The court conducted an on-the-record plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739677 - 2023-12-14
had decided to accept a plea offer from the State. The court conducted an on-the-record plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739677 - 2023-12-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
of facts and statement of the case contain no citations to the record and only two citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62279 - 2014-09-15
of facts and statement of the case contain no citations to the record and only two citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62279 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dontae L. Doyle
, and the fleeing count; (2) when he advised Doyle not to testify; (3) when he failed to subpoena time records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4884 - 2017-09-19
, and the fleeing count; (2) when he advised Doyle not to testify; (3) when he failed to subpoena time records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4884 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
response, and this court has independently reviewed the record. This court agrees with appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266829 - 2020-07-07
response, and this court has independently reviewed the record. This court agrees with appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266829 - 2020-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
resulting from the plea; (2) whether an adequate record has been developed on which to decide issues raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
resulting from the plea; (2) whether an adequate record has been developed on which to decide issues raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the hearing that would have [a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21
at the hearing that would have [a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Orville H. Werner v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Werner argues that LIRC's decision is not supported by credible and substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8333 - 2017-09-19
. Werner argues that LIRC's decision is not supported by credible and substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8333 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we summarily affirm the order because there are no issues that would have arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245207 - 2019-08-21
of the record, we summarily affirm the order because there are no issues that would have arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245207 - 2019-08-21
2008 WI APP 20
, which presently encourages electronic recording of custodial interviews[2] but does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31617 - 2008-02-19
, which presently encourages electronic recording of custodial interviews[2] but does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31617 - 2008-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that neither claim was supported by the record, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65051 - 2011-05-31
determined that neither claim was supported by the record, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65051 - 2011-05-31