Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17091 - 17100 of 84378 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 17091 - 17100 of 84378 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
and was the victim of an apparent robbery—the pockets of Park’s pants appeared to have been searched, and the clip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135733 - 2015-02-25
and was the victim of an apparent robbery—the pockets of Park’s pants appeared to have been searched, and the clip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135733 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). In some instances, Peterson appears to be referencing issues or information from other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101631 - 2017-09-21
). In some instances, Peterson appears to be referencing issues or information from other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[the] agency action or remand the case to the agency if [we] find[] that the agency’s action depends on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974955 - 2025-06-26
[the] agency action or remand the case to the agency if [we] find[] that the agency’s action depends on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974955 - 2025-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and attorney fees.3 The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896053 - 2025-01-02
, seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and attorney fees.3 The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896053 - 2025-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case, that the prosecutor’s misconduct during closing argument merits reversal of the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
of the State’s case, that the prosecutor’s misconduct during closing argument merits reversal of the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s case, that the prosecutor’s misconduct during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15
his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s case, that the prosecutor’s misconduct during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. E.
that joinder under the facts of his case was impermissible under WIS. STAT. § 971.12(3), which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5369 - 2017-09-19
that joinder under the facts of his case was impermissible under WIS. STAT. § 971.12(3), which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5369 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Response Brief (Congressmen)
- ii - TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Baldus v. Members of Wisconsin Gov’t Accountability Bd
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-11-01
- ii - TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Baldus v. Members of Wisconsin Gov’t Accountability Bd
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-11-01
State v. Edward J. E.
. at 388-89. ¶16 Edward contends that joinder under the facts of his case was impermissible under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5369 - 2005-03-31
. at 388-89. ¶16 Edward contends that joinder under the facts of his case was impermissible under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5369 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward J. E.
. at 388-89. ¶16 Edward contends that joinder under the facts of his case was impermissible under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5368 - 2005-03-31
. at 388-89. ¶16 Edward contends that joinder under the facts of his case was impermissible under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5368 - 2005-03-31