Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 17369 for Cost.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 17369 for Cost.
[PDF]
Shannon Labine v. Stephen Puckett
affirming the circuit court's denial of his request for a waiver of costs and fees. We granted review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16676 - 2017-09-21
affirming the circuit court's denial of his request for a waiver of costs and fees. We granted review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Scott E. Selmer
) requirements. No. 1998AP886-D 2 Attorney Selmer shall also be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18715 - 2017-09-21
) requirements. No. 1998AP886-D 2 Attorney Selmer shall also be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18715 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charlie Sislo
and the State would recommend a $100 fine plus $209 in court costs. The court proceeded with a colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18850 - 2005-07-05
and the State would recommend a $100 fine plus $209 in court costs. The court proceeded with a colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18850 - 2005-07-05
Robert J. Marso v. Kingstad Law Offices
, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file a timely notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20093 - 2007-06-04
, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file a timely notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20093 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 Riese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85609 - 2014-09-15
an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 Riese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85609 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and consider an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85609 - 2012-07-30
and consider an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85609 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
fees and costs and denying a motion to vacate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94984 - 2014-09-15
fees and costs and denying a motion to vacate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94984 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
J. Marso $2,547.55, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
J. Marso $2,547.55, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charlie Sislo
would recommend a $100 fine plus $209 in court costs. The court proceeded with a colloquy with Sislo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18850 - 2017-09-21
would recommend a $100 fine plus $209 in court costs. The court proceeded with a colloquy with Sislo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of triggering the cost-shifting provision of WIS. STAT. § 807.01(1) (2017-18).1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256654 - 2020-03-18
of triggering the cost-shifting provision of WIS. STAT. § 807.01(1) (2017-18).1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256654 - 2020-03-18