Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 16451 for commenting.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing with a mind made up. T[w]o, the court finds nothing improper about [the trial court’s] comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
sentencing with a mind made up. T[w]o, the court finds nothing improper about [the trial court’s] comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court could certainly have been more extensive in its comments, review of the record permits only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145097 - 2015-07-27
the trial court could certainly have been more extensive in its comments, review of the record permits only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145097 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case. On that point, the Restatement rejects the State’s position. The comment cited by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62849 - 2014-09-15
case. On that point, the Restatement rejects the State’s position. The comment cited by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the prosecutor interjected to clarify what he deemed “misleading” comments by defense counsel in addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194816 - 2017-09-21
, the prosecutor interjected to clarify what he deemed “misleading” comments by defense counsel in addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194816 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Alleged Improper Comment on Right Against Self-Incrimination ¶8 Sennholz argues Myles impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160531 - 2017-09-21
. Alleged Improper Comment on Right Against Self-Incrimination ¶8 Sennholz argues Myles impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160531 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
his conviction for manufacturing THC as a party to the crime. Although comments in the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
his conviction for manufacturing THC as a party to the crime. Although comments in the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
[PDF]
State v. Aretus S. Fenn
if the jury did infer from Brooks’ comment that [Fenn] had been in prison, this fleeting reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
if the jury did infer from Brooks’ comment that [Fenn] had been in prison, this fleeting reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
State v. Philip J. Foster
to withdraw his plea because the prosecutor materially breached the plea agreement by her comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
to withdraw his plea because the prosecutor materially breached the plea agreement by her comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
State v. Aretus S. Fenn
infer from Brooks’ comment that [Fenn] had been in prison, this fleeting reference was not grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13401 - 2005-03-31
infer from Brooks’ comment that [Fenn] had been in prison, this fleeting reference was not grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13401 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a party to the crime. Although comments in the prosecutor’s closing argument were improper in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15
as a party to the crime. Although comments in the prosecutor’s closing argument were improper in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15