Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Midthun
the jury to infer Midthun’s intent to deliver. The prosecution had a duty to prove all elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14857 - 2017-09-21
the jury to infer Midthun’s intent to deliver. The prosecution had a duty to prove all elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We affirm. We previously articulated the winding history of this prosecution in State v. Earls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01
. We affirm. We previously articulated the winding history of this prosecution in State v. Earls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Linda R. Cauley
effective assistance of counsel and that the doctrine of double jeopardy precludes state prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8608 - 2017-09-19
effective assistance of counsel and that the doctrine of double jeopardy precludes state prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8608 - 2017-09-19
State v. Julian Esteve McKinnie
with, prosecuted once for, and convicted of only the single offense of felony murder. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
with, prosecuted once for, and convicted of only the single offense of felony murder. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
State v. Dariell D. Cross
on the ground that double jeopardy precluded prosecution for battery because he had already been subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that double jeopardy precluded prosecution for battery because he had already been subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Facundo
" the government into the criminal activity so as to make repugnant defendant's prosecution. State v. Gibas, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
" the government into the criminal activity so as to make repugnant defendant's prosecution. State v. Gibas, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Shea
to compel the prosecution to provide all discovery documents.3 Shea also contended that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2759 - 2017-09-19
to compel the prosecution to provide all discovery documents.3 Shea also contended that the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2759 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
was imposed. WIS. STAT. § 973.155(1)(a). A person is “in custody” when subject to prosecution for escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15
was imposed. WIS. STAT. § 973.155(1)(a). A person is “in custody” when subject to prosecution for escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The prosecution agreed to recommend a five-year sentence on the possession conviction and that a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
. The prosecution agreed to recommend a five-year sentence on the possession conviction and that a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.155(1)(a). A person is “in custody” when subject to prosecution for escape under Wis. Stat. § 946.42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20
. § 973.155(1)(a). A person is “in custody” when subject to prosecution for escape under Wis. Stat. § 946.42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20