Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 1711 - 1720 of 83389 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing factors during the reconfinement hearing. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶7 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44278 - 2008-03-31
sentencing factors during the reconfinement hearing. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶7 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44278 - 2008-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he and his wife were the owners in fee simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
that he and his wife were the owners in fee simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78507 - 2014-09-15
State v. Keith B. Kelly
hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered to assist in the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31
hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered to assist in the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith B. Kelly
elicited in prior evidentiary hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2514 - 2017-09-19
elicited in prior evidentiary hearings held in this case.” Thus, no further evidence was offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2514 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession. The complaint alleges that Schultz has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78507 - 2012-02-22
simple of the disputed property by way of adverse possession. The complaint alleges that Schultz has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78507 - 2012-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Ferry
illegality associated with the first search. The primary concern in attenuation cases is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
illegality associated with the first search. The primary concern in attenuation cases is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
2008 WI APP 154
to a parolee. However, both parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
to a parolee. However, both parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI APP 154
parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search was valid under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15
parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search was valid under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nakia N. Hayes
, 502 U.S. 873 (1991), it is supported by the rationale of that case. In Jeter, a no-knock search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8280 - 2017-09-19
, 502 U.S. 873 (1991), it is supported by the rationale of that case. In Jeter, a no-knock search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8280 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 17
there to conduct a search.” Id. ¶13 The parties all agree that Jardines controls in this case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21
there to conduct a search.” Id. ¶13 The parties all agree that Jardines controls in this case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21