Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17101 - 17110 of 30107 for de.
Search results 17101 - 17110 of 30107 for de.
State v. Antonio J. Spencer
, subject to this court’s de novo review. Id. 1. Counsel’s failure to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
, subject to this court’s de novo review. Id. 1. Counsel’s failure to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Brown, 276 Wis. 2d 559, ¶5. ¶8 We begin our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Brown, 276 Wis. 2d 559, ¶5. ¶8 We begin our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36099 - 2009-04-07
State v. Joanne Sekula
on that issue. Id. In addition, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law which we also review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3712 - 2005-03-31
on that issue. Id. In addition, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law which we also review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3712 - 2005-03-31
State v. April O.
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16018 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16018 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71554 - 2011-09-28
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71554 - 2011-09-28
State v. Amy M. Yulga
the circumstances of a search or seizure meet constitutional standards is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18029 - 2005-05-04
the circumstances of a search or seizure meet constitutional standards is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18029 - 2005-05-04
Joshua D. Hansen v. Carl H. Degnitz
interpret the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
interpret the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29860 - 2007-07-31
court’s findings of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29860 - 2007-07-31
State v. Donald J. Buford
reviews de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Moreover, a reviewing court need not address both parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Moreover, a reviewing court need not address both parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
Roy F. Bartels v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7161 - 2005-03-31
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7161 - 2005-03-31