Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17111 - 17120 of 29821 for des.
Search results 17111 - 17120 of 29821 for des.
WI App 36 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP3007-CR Complete Tit...
a search was reasonable, and therefore lawful under the Fourth Amendment, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92854 - 2013-03-26
a search was reasonable, and therefore lawful under the Fourth Amendment, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92854 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29624 - 2014-09-15
review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29624 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Paula M.S. v. Neal A.R.
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, § 805.17(2), STATS., we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13923 - 2014-09-15
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, § 805.17(2), STATS., we review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13923 - 2014-09-15
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
State v. Samuel Jones
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. at ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. at ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31
S.J.A.J. v. First Things First
the lawsuit. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15194 - 2005-03-31
the lawsuit. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Counsel’s Actions in Relation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238603 - 2019-04-04
assistance was ineffective is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Counsel’s Actions in Relation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238603 - 2019-04-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47753 - 2014-09-15
to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47753 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that I review de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255683 - 2020-03-05
the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that I review de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255683 - 2020-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See id., 211 Wis. 2d at 203–204, 564 N.W.2d at 720. ¶10 The first Klessig step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76219 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See id., 211 Wis. 2d at 203–204, 564 N.W.2d at 720. ¶10 The first Klessig step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76219 - 2014-09-15