Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17121 - 17130 of 50138 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Our review of the record reveals no basis for an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209546 - 2018-03-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051051 - 2025-12-17

[PDF] State v. Earnest Alexander
. (internal quotations omitted). ¶9 Our supreme court has recognized that this traditional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19676 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, is unreasonable. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2018AP1532-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238920 - 2019-04-09

Lawrence G. Wickert v. John Burggraf
). Our review of a jury's verdict is limited. That verdict must be sustained on appeal if there is any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11099 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ray A. Schiller
in the standard jury instruction. ¶4 Our supreme court has already decided this issue. As Schiller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3901 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110282 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
postconviction motion alleging newly discovered evidence. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213314 - 2018-05-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). We do not substitute our evaluation of the evidence for that of the trier of fact’s, but look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] David A. Schlemm v. Jon E. Litscher
the matter. We need not address Schlemm’s last issue, because our review of a prison disciplinary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6028 - 2017-09-19