Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17121 - 17130 of 81919 for simple case.
Search results 17121 - 17130 of 81919 for simple case.
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
. In these consolidated cases, Frankie Wardell Simmons, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4038 - 2005-03-31
. In these consolidated cases, Frankie Wardell Simmons, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
concluded, “For reasons not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
concluded, “For reasons not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
State v. Delbert L. Manke
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9401 - 2005-03-31
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9401 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter J. Long
” in the intoxicated-driving case. Arguing in support of the motion, counsel for Long also contended that dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4622 - 2005-03-31
” in the intoxicated-driving case. Arguing in support of the motion, counsel for Long also contended that dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel E. Holman
appeared at a scheduling conference before the Honorable Jean DiMotto. The case was then scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14520 - 2017-09-21
appeared at a scheduling conference before the Honorable Jean DiMotto. The case was then scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Fradario L. Brim
occurred on the homicide charge, for which Brim was acquitted. In this case, he contends that joinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5336 - 2017-09-19
occurred on the homicide charge, for which Brim was acquitted. In this case, he contends that joinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5336 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jesse J. Madison
2004 WI App 46 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-3099 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5902 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 46 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-3099 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is the law regarding the use of PBTs. In that case, the supreme court held that a law enforcement officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
is the law regarding the use of PBTs. In that case, the supreme court held that a law enforcement officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In this case, it is alleged that while the police were investigating a complaint made against the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31663 - 2014-09-15
. In this case, it is alleged that while the police were investigating a complaint made against the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31663 - 2014-09-15