Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17121 - 17130 of 83335 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] State v. Raymond T. Bradley
months after committing the charged offense, Bradley entered another elderly person's home and searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2909 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to detain him, thus violating his constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78740 - 2014-01-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, articulable suspicion, police may ask questions, request identification, and ask for consent to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86357 - 2014-09-15

State v. April J. Ingalls
Wis. 2d 681, 694, 370 N.W.2d 745 (1985). Appellate courts search the record for evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3865 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
in the bloodstream created a per se exigency allowing for a warrantless, nonconsensual search. State v. Bohling, 173
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140534 - 2012-10-31

[PDF] State v. April J. Ingalls
, 124 Wis. 2d 681, 694, 370 N.W.2d 745 (1985). Appellate courts search the record for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3865 - 2017-09-20

State v. Annette S.
will be affirmed. See id., ¶ 39 (citation omitted). Accordingly, “appellate courts search the record for credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6495 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution … protect[s] citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.” State v. Pallone, 2000 WI 77, ¶28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38160 - 2009-07-22

[PDF] State v. Joseph Pearce
. Therefore, the nature of the verdict is not a pertinent factor in this case. No. 95-2245-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9523 - 2017-09-19

Linda M. Heath-Miller v. Mark A. Miller
(1982). Our task as a reviewing court is to search the record for reasons to sustain the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5478 - 2005-03-31