Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17131 - 17140 of 29712 for des.
Search results 17131 - 17140 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶12, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35777 - 2014-09-15
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, ¶12, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35777 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 99
a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50541 - 2014-09-15
a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50541 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130390 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10
Dankwart Essbaum v. National Insurance Company of Wisconsin
of summary judgment, is de novo. See Lambrecht v. Estate of Kaczmarczyk, 2001 WI 25, ¶21, 241 Wis. 2d 804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6509 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment, is de novo. See Lambrecht v. Estate of Kaczmarczyk, 2001 WI 25, ¶21, 241 Wis. 2d 804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6509 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis.2d 222, 229, 499 N.W.2d 218, 221 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13584 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County, 175 Wis.2d 222, 229, 499 N.W.2d 218, 221 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
asks us to disregard the court’s assessment of the best interests factors and substitute our own de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247831 - 2020-01-30
asks us to disregard the court’s assessment of the best interests factors and substitute our own de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247831 - 2020-01-30
David Ginder v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
The interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15638 - 2005-03-31
The interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15