Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17131 - 17140 of 29827 for des.
Search results 17131 - 17140 of 29827 for des.
State v. Christopher L. Ambort
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
was violated. Both are questions of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
set of facts, we use the de novo standard. Lee, 314 Wis. 2d 764, ¶7. Restitution is aimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218230 - 2018-08-29
set of facts, we use the de novo standard. Lee, 314 Wis. 2d 764, ¶7. Restitution is aimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218230 - 2018-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4786 - 2017-09-19
, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4786 - 2017-09-19
Norman L. Zimdars v. Margaret A. VanCleave
is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. at ¶26. ¶6 In Washington, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5948 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. at ¶26. ¶6 In Washington, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5948 - 2005-03-31
Lola M. v. City of Milwaukee
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Here, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4082 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Here, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4082 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22
State v. Abby J. Olson
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
State v. Renee A. Fredel
the facts as found by the trial court constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
the facts as found by the trial court constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald Harris
of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Harris first suggests that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12855 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Harris first suggests that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12855 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20
we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20