Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17131 - 17140 of 17552 for ex.

[PDF] Frontsheet
standards for interpreting statutes are well-known and need not be repeated here. See State ex re. Kalal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168114 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 22
of law.” Aicher ex rel. LaBarge v. Wis. Patients Comp. Fund, 2000 WI 98, ¶80, 237 Wis. 2d 99, 613 N.W.2d
/supreme/docs/23ap1464.pdf - 2025-06-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Streuly; such an inference would be speculative rather than reasonable. See State ex rel. N.A.C. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908199 - 2025-01-30

[PDF] WI App 104
2010 WI App 104 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1249-CR C...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51689 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
requires us to determine what the statute means. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51366 - 2010-06-23

Rodney A. Arneson v. Marcia Jezwinski
process clause of the federal constitution. Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 538-41; see also State ex rel. DeLuca
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17024 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
be contrary to its plain meaning and would read into the statute language that is not there. See State ex rel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33223 - 2008-06-25

[PDF] WI APP 65
.” State ex rel. Hennekens v. City of River Falls Police & Fire Comm’n, 124 Wis. 2d 413, 420, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112885 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rodney A. Arneson v. Marcia Jezwinski
also State ex rel. DeLuca v. Common Council, 72 Wis. 2d 672, 678, 242 N.W.2d 689 (1976); Phares v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17024 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 134
of the parties as expressed by the contractual language.” State ex rel. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. Pleva, 155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28642 - 2014-09-15