Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17131 - 17140 of 30739 for pick up.

[PDF] State v. William J. Murphy
of kissing, fondling, and touching Murphy's penis followed. One of the letters required C. to dress up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11144 - 2017-09-19

State v. Samuel Jones
that the delay up to that time should not be attributed to the State. We agree that the time that elapsed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12857 - 2005-03-31

Association of State Prosecutors v. Milwaukee County and the
. The Association contends that, since the contributions to be transferred make up less than one-third of one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16887 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for a background check, but no visitation was ever set up. During cross-examination, D.T. testified that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Brunet
. The detective also told Zandt that he might accept the motorcycle in trade. During a follow-up phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10518 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Barbara Gardner v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
doctor, Violeta Singson, for “an annual well-child or check-up visit.” According to the medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4084 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Ethelyn I.C. v. Waukesha County
contact or treatment. The home health care aide cleaned her up and then called a supervisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21

Michael S.B. v. Frederic J. Berns
of up to $10,000 to individual persons each year, because gifts up to $10,000 per person per year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8702 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Christopher Johnson
. with pillows. According to Szaflarski, Elizabeth was curled up, protecting her head and upper body, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8743 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
., concurring). A majority of the supreme court, however, refrained from taking up the issue because it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76444 - 2014-09-15