Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17151 - 17160 of 67826 for law.

CA Blank Order
Courthouse 626 Main Street Darlington, WI 53530 Joel J. Dahlgren Black Dog Co-op Law 714 N. Franklin Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94984 - 2013-04-01

State v. Richard W. Foelker
is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See State v. Ford, 211 Wis.2d 739, 743, 565 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13361 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Larry O. Loken
with the administrative law judge regarding the credibility and demeanor of the witnesses, the commission reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13542 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
with officers’ lawful orders and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30036 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth S. Meidenbauer
argues that he did not make an illegal U-turn as a matter of law because he stopped in the cross-over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3623 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Dwayne Seals v. David H. Schwarz
and Appeals (DHA) acted contrary to law and without substantial evidence when it revoked his probation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4466 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in a cognizable way or that the court failed to adjudicate a claim contrary to the facts and the law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045485 - 2025-12-04

COURT OF APPEALS
an educational program about it. It was two law enforcement officers, if I remember correctly, and they gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111588 - 2014-05-05

State v. Susan Triggs
questions of fact and law. See Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d at 236. Findings of historical fact will not be upset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31

VIP Construction, Inc. v. Rajko Andeljkovic
as a matter of law. Id. at 496-97. ¶6 On appeal, VIP Construction argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6620 - 2005-03-31