Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17161 - 17170 of 29827 for des.
Search results 17161 - 17170 of 29827 for des.
Lola M. v. City of Milwaukee
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Here, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4082 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Here, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4082 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22
). The proper interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33447 - 2008-07-22
State v. Abby J. Olson
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
State v. Renee A. Fredel
the facts as found by the trial court constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
the facts as found by the trial court constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald Harris
of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Harris first suggests that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12855 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Harris first suggests that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12855 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20
we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 157
summary judgment we employ the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34116 - 2014-09-15
summary judgment we employ the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34116 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the legal significance of those facts de novo. See Klinefelter v. Dutch, 161 Wis. 2d 28, 33, 467 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183554 - 2017-09-21
the legal significance of those facts de novo. See Klinefelter v. Dutch, 161 Wis. 2d 28, 33, 467 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard, and questions of ultimate constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See State v. Harris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55960 - 2014-09-15
standard, and questions of ultimate constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See State v. Harris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03