Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17161 - 17170 of 29712 for des.
Search results 17161 - 17170 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
consent statute to findings of fact is a legal question that we review de novo. See State v. Piddington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415846 - 2021-08-25
consent statute to findings of fact is a legal question that we review de novo. See State v. Piddington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415846 - 2021-08-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104868 - 2017-09-21
clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104868 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165873 - 2017-09-21
of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165873 - 2017-09-21
Joshua D. Hansen v. Carl H. Degnitz
interpret the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
interpret the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17882 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29860 - 2007-07-31
court’s findings of historical and evidentiary facts unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29860 - 2007-07-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Karleen K. Raasch
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13679 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to relief. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35125 - 2014-09-15
to relief. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35125 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3, (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo. See City of Sun Prairie v. Davis, No. 97-1651, slip op. at 3, (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12957 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19
). However, whether these facts fulfill the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5883 - 2017-09-19