Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17171 - 17180 of 69642 for he.
Search results 17171 - 17180 of 69642 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. Parisi maintains that he is entitled to a new trial on the seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212009 - 2018-05-02
postconviction motion for a new trial. Parisi maintains that he is entitled to a new trial on the seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212009 - 2018-05-02
CA Blank Order
)(a) (2011-12).[1] He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Lovejoy’s postconviction/appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
)(a) (2011-12).[1] He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Lovejoy’s postconviction/appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
for possible mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35792 - 2009-03-09
for possible mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35792 - 2009-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
of alcohol coming from Rooni at a distance of two to three feet. Heisel also noted that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
of alcohol coming from Rooni at a distance of two to three feet. Heisel also noted that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
. Undray B. was informed of his right to respond, but he did not respond. After considering the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101885 - 2013-09-09
. Undray B. was informed of his right to respond, but he did not respond. After considering the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101885 - 2013-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. David argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously admitted evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
. David argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously admitted evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the shooting, because he had just been served with a temporary restraining order on the victim’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106336 - 2017-09-21
of the shooting, because he had just been served with a temporary restraining order on the victim’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lester Bowen v. Village of Curtiss
a verdict in Bowen’s favor, finding he was damaged in the amount of $875. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3000 - 2017-09-19
a verdict in Bowen’s favor, finding he was damaged in the amount of $875. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3000 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of knowingly violating a domestic abuse injunction, all charged as a habitual criminality repeater. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236533 - 2019-03-05
of knowingly violating a domestic abuse injunction, all charged as a habitual criminality repeater. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236533 - 2019-03-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
mitigating factors. We reject McClellan’s argument because the information he claims counsel should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15