Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17181 - 17190 of 64755 for b's.
Search results 17181 - 17190 of 64755 for b's.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
)(a) (classifying fleeing and eluding as a Class H felony); 973.01(2)(b)8., (c), & (d)5. (providing maximum terms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997634 - 2025-08-20
)(a) (classifying fleeing and eluding as a Class H felony); 973.01(2)(b)8., (c), & (d)5. (providing maximum terms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997634 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
Taylor County v. Mary Z.
abuse as grounds for termination under WIS. STAT. § 48.415(5)(b). A jury found all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7662 - 2017-09-19
abuse as grounds for termination under WIS. STAT. § 48.415(5)(b). A jury found all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7662 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for Dane County: Juan B. Colas, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90570 - 2012-12-12
for Dane County: Juan B. Colas, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90570 - 2012-12-12
County of Dodge v. Bryan E. Harned
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10251 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10251 - 2005-03-31
State v. Debra A. Sledge
an issue that is inadequately briefed.). B. New Factor. Sledge next claims her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14004 - 2005-03-31
an issue that is inadequately briefed.). B. New Factor. Sledge next claims her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14004 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Goro Tsuchiya, M.D. v. James P. Brennan
., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JAMES P. BRENNAN, D/B/A BRENNAN & COLLINS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12592 - 2017-09-21
., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JAMES P. BRENNAN, D/B/A BRENNAN & COLLINS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12592 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Douglas B. Baker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35512 - 2009-02-09
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Douglas B. Baker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35512 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal.”). No. 2018AP2130 5 B. Exclusion of Witness ¶10 Meyer seemingly contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241002 - 2019-05-23
on appeal.”). No. 2018AP2130 5 B. Exclusion of Witness ¶10 Meyer seemingly contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241002 - 2019-05-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
WISCONSIN STAT. § 767.32(1)(b) states: “A court may not revise or modify a judgment or order that waives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31323 - 2014-09-15
WISCONSIN STAT. § 767.32(1)(b) states: “A court may not revise or modify a judgment or order that waives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 The factors enumerated in WIS. STAT. § 767.56(1c) are: (a) The length of the marriage. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219144 - 2018-09-19
2 The factors enumerated in WIS. STAT. § 767.56(1c) are: (a) The length of the marriage. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219144 - 2018-09-19